Bar Exam · MBE Elements

MBE elements — key rules for all 7 Bar Exam subjects

Q: What are the 7 MBE subjects?

Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts (including UCC Article 2), Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, and Torts. Each subject has 25 questions; 175 are scored and 25 are unscored pretest items.

Q: What is the most important MBE subject?

Torts and Contracts are often the most straightforward and highest-scoring subjects for well-prepared candidates. Evidence and Civil Procedure tend to require the most rule memorisation. Constitutional Law has the broadest conceptual scope.

Q: How are MBE questions structured?

Each MBE question presents a short fact pattern (2–5 sentences) followed by a question stem and four answer choices (A–D). Approximately 1.8 minutes per question. Wrong answers are often "almost correct" — understand the rule completely.

Q: What is the best strategy for MBE answer elimination?

Identify the rule first, then test each choice against it. Eliminate choices that state incorrect rules, overstate or understate the legal standard, or apply the right rule to wrong facts. Two choices are usually wrong for clear reasons; the difficulty is between the final two.

The MBE (Multistate Bar Examination) is 175 scored questions across 7 subjects — each worth exactly 25 questions. The questions reward precise rule knowledge applied to specific facts, not general legal intuition. This reference covers the highest-frequency rules per subject.

Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Contracts & UCC Art. 2 Criminal Law & Procedure Evidence Real Property Torts

Civil Procedure

25 questions

Subject-matter jurisdiction

Federal question (§1331); diversity (§1332): complete diversity + $75k+; supplemental jurisdiction §1367

Personal jurisdiction

Minimum contacts (Int'l Shoe); purposeful availment; foreseeability; specific vs. general jurisdiction; Burnham tag

Erie doctrine

Federal court applies state substantive law; federal procedural law; Hanna v. Plumer: FRCP controls if applicable and valid

Pleading standards

Twombly/Iqbal plausibility; Rule 12(b) defenses (12(b)(6) failure to state); Rule 11 sanctions

Summary judgment

No genuine dispute of material fact; movant burden; non-movant must show specific facts; Rule 56

Claim & issue preclusion

Res judicata: same claim, valid final judgment, same parties; collateral estoppel: same issue, actually litigated, necessarily decided

Constitutional Law

25 questions

Commerce Clause

Congress can regulate: channels/instrumentalities of interstate commerce; substantial effect on interstate commerce (Lopez/Morrison limits)

Due Process (14th)

Substantive DP: fundamental rights (strict scrutiny) vs. non-fundamental (rational basis); Procedural DP: life/liberty/property interest → notice + hearing

Equal Protection

Strict scrutiny: race, national origin, alienage (federal), fundamental rights; Intermediate: sex, legitimacy; Rational basis: everything else

1st Amendment — Speech

Content-based: strict scrutiny; content-neutral: intermediate; unprotected speech: true threats, incitement (Brandenburg), obscenity (Miller), fighting words

Establishment Clause

Government neutrality toward religion; no coercion; Lemon test (background); Kennedy v. Bremerton (2022) shift toward historical practices

Takings Clause (5th)

Physical invasion = per se taking; regulatory taking: Penn Central balancing (economic impact, investment expectations, character); Lucas total deprivation

Contracts & UCC Art. 2

25 questions

Offer & acceptance

Mailbox rule: acceptance on dispatch (not receipt); revocation on receipt; option contract: irrevocable; firm offer (UCC §2-205): merchant, signed, max 3 months

Consideration

Bargained-for exchange; past consideration insufficient; preexisting duty rule (exceptions: modification under UCC, rescission & new contract)

Statute of Frauds

MYLEGS: Marriage, Year (>1yr), Land, Executor's promise, Goods ≥$500 (UCC), Suretyship; electronic signatures (ESIGN); part performance exception

Breach & damages

Material breach: non-breaching party discharged; expectation damages = benefit of bargain; consequential damages: Hadley foreseeable; specific performance: unique goods only

UCC §2-207 (Battle of Forms)

Additional terms between merchants: become part of contract unless (i) offer limits acceptance, (ii) material alteration, (iii) objection within reasonable time

Implied warranty of merchantability

Automatically implied in merchant sales; goods must be fit for ordinary purpose; disclaimer must mention "merchantability" and be conspicuous

Criminal Law & Procedure

25 questions

Mens rea (MPC)

Purpose, Knowledge, Recklessness, Negligence; strict liability crimes (no mens rea); transferred intent doctrine

4th Amendment — Search & Seizure

Reasonable expectation of privacy (Katz); warrant required unless exception: SILA, exigent, automobile, plain view, consent, stop-and-frisk (Terry)

Miranda

Custodial interrogation triggers Miranda; rights: silence + attorney; invocation must be unambiguous; waiver must be knowing and voluntary

Homicide

Murder: malice aforethought (intent to kill, serious injury, depraved heart, felony murder); voluntary manslaughter: adequate provocation; involuntary: criminal negligence or unlawful act

Accomplice liability

Aid/abet/encourage with intent; liable for target crime and natural/probable consequences; mere presence insufficient without intent

Defenses

Self-defense: reasonable belief of imminent force (no duty to retreat in majority); insanity (MNaghten: didn't know nature or wrongfulness); entrapment: predisposition test (federal)

Evidence

25 questions

Hearsay

Out-of-court statement offered for truth of matter asserted; admissions by party-opponent (not hearsay); prior inconsistent statements (limited use)

Hearsay exceptions — FRE 803

Present sense impression (§803(1)); excited utterance (§803(2)); medical diagnosis (§803(4)); business records (§803(6)); public records (§803(8))

Confrontation Clause

Crawford: testimonial hearsay inadmissible unless declarant unavailable + prior cross-examination; non-testimonial: reliability analysis

FRE 404 — Character evidence

Generally inadmissible to prove propensity; exceptions: MIMIC (Motive, Intent, Mistake, Identity, Common Scheme); defendant who puts character in issue

Expert testimony — FRE 702

Daubert: judge as gatekeeper; methodology must be reliable (tested, peer-reviewed, error rate, acceptance); applies to basis and principles

Privilege

Attorney-client: confidential communications in professional relationship; spousal: testimonial privilege (holder varies by state) vs. marital communications privilege

Real Property

25 questions

Estates in land

Fee simple absolute; fee simple determinable (to grantor automatically); fee simple subject to condition subsequent (right of entry); life estate; future interests

Recording acts

Race: first to record wins; Notice: BFP without notice wins even if second to record; Race-Notice: BFP who records first wins

BFP elements

Bona fide purchaser: for value, without notice (actual/constructive/inquiry), records first (in race-notice states)

Adverse possession

OCEAN: Open, Continuous, Exclusive, Actual, Notorious; statutory period varies; claim of right may be required; tacking allowed with privity

Landlord-tenant

Implied warranty of habitability (residential); duty to repair (landlord); constructive eviction; tenant's duty not to commit waste

Easements

Express vs. implied (prior use, necessity); appurtenant vs. in gross; creation: PING (Prescription, Implication, Necessity, Grant); termination: merger, abandonment, estoppel

Torts

25 questions

Negligence elements

Duty (reasonable person standard); breach (B < PL, Carroll Towing); actual causation (but-for; substantial factor); proximate causation; damages

Strict liability

Abnormally dangerous activities (6-factor Restatement test); animals (wild: always; domestic: "one-bite" rule); products liability (manufacturing defect)

Products liability

Manufacturing defect: strict liability; design defect: risk-utility or consumer expectations; failure to warn: inadequate instructions/warnings; plaintiff need not be buyer

Defamation

Public figure/official: actual malice (NYT v. Sullivan); private figure/public concern: negligence; private figure/private concern: strict liability possible

Intentional torts

Battery: harmful/offensive contact with intent; Assault: reasonable apprehension of imminent battery; False imprisonment: confined + no reasonable escape; IIED: extreme/outrageous

Comparative fault

Pure comparative fault: recover proportionally always; modified: recovery only if plaintiff <50% or ≤50% at fault; contributory negligence: complete bar (few states)

MBE strategy: rule first, facts second

The most common MBE error is reading the facts before knowing the rule. State the rule to yourself before reading answer choices. Then check which choice correctly states AND applies the rule to these specific facts. The wrong choices either state an incorrect rule or correctly state a rule inapplicable to these facts. Practice MBE questions on SGrade →

What are the 7 MBE subjects?

Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts (including UCC Article 2), Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, and Torts. Each subject has 25 questions; 175 are scored and 25 are unscored pretest items.

What is the most important MBE subject?

Torts and Contracts are often the most straightforward and highest-scoring subjects for well-prepared candidates. Evidence and Civil Procedure tend to require the most rule memorisation. Constitutional Law has the broadest conceptual scope.

How are MBE questions structured?

Each MBE question presents a short fact pattern (2–5 sentences) followed by a question stem and four answer choices (A–D). Approximately 1.8 minutes per question. Wrong answers are often "almost correct" — understand the rule completely.

What is the best strategy for MBE answer elimination?

Identify the rule first, then test each choice against it. Eliminate choices that state incorrect rules, overstate or understate the legal standard, or apply the right rule to wrong facts. Two choices are usually wrong for clear reasons; the difficulty is between the final two.

Test your MBE rule recall with exam-realistic practice questions.

Start Bar Exam Practice →